Posts tagged ‘futurism’

February 10th, 2010

The Science Fiction of the Past

The past few weeks, I’ve read a lot of science fiction from the 60s and the 70s. While filled with amazing vision and ambition, it seems almost quaint to read it in the year 2010. If there’s one thing we can say for certain about our visions of the future it is this: We can never know what to expect if we try to base it on today’s paradigms.

The books that I’ve been reading have mainly been random books by Philip K. Dick. The latest one I finished was Our Friends From Frolix 8, a story about a man living in a totalitarian surveillance-heavy society containing – in addition to ‘normal’ people – two transhuman groups; the Unusuals and the New Men. The Unusuals have psychic powers in one form or another; they may be able to read minds, move objects with their minds, start fires or something similar. The New Men are like Humanity++, they have the same skills as us, but super-charged. They can do trigonometry before their tenth birthday, look better than the rest of us, are healthier, and so on.

The predictable adventures occur – okay; semi-predictable, actually, since this is, after all, a Philip K. Dick book – and the protagonist eventually gets the girl (no, wait, she dies) and the ruling order of Unusuals and New Men is toppled.

Since Philip K. Dick wrote this in 1970, a number of things we take for granted today weren’t even thought of at the time. The characters in the book actually walk to phone booths to talk to each other; but these booths have video functionality. The thought of picking up a phone that fits in your pocket was so foreign at the time that it didn’t even fit into the mind of this, one of the most visionary of Science Fiction authors of the past 100 years. The Internet didn’t exist at the time, so nowhere do we have any mentions of widely accessible databases of information that are stored and accessible from across the world. Instead, we have filing stations with microfilm that are accessible from anywhere within the building where one is sitting. People travel from one part of the world on flying ships to meet each other instead of engaging in telepresence. Cars don’t just drive on the streets, they can fly now … and they’re called squibs.

While the book was fun and had some very interesting plot twists, it – and the others that I read – have gotten me thinking. A lot of people have wild dreams about the future. They might be technology-optimistic immortality-yearning Extropists. They might be expecting aliens to come destroy the world. They might think feminism, Greenpeace and whale-saving will make the world a fantastic place. They might think overpopulation will ruin all hope for the future. They might be espousing a specific economic or political theory that will change everything, but they all tend to do one thing wrong.

They do it expecting their own paradigm to be the one to dominate in the future.

Imagine, 300 years ago, when a person was asked how the world would look if it would grow to contain nearly seven billion people who all need to travel long distances to get to where they need to be on a daily basis. This person, stuck in their own paradigm, would imagine carriages drawn by horses littering the streets, the masses of farms needed to sustain such a huge population, the complete and utter chaos as the aristocracies of the world try to maintain order. Fast forward 300 years to today and notice that none of this is a problem; science and social progress has created a complete paradigm shift.

We don’t even need to look at centuries as a time scale to see things like this, Moore’s Law can be applied to society as a whole as we see accelerating change all over the world. Only twenty years ago, it was rare for a person to even know what the Internet was. Ten years ago, people had dial-up and ISDN connections to the Internet and were able to do basic tasks over it. Today, most people in the western world carry an Internet connection in their pocket on a daily basis and access Twitter, Facebook and their e-mail from wherever they want to be.

I was recollecting my dreams and hopes with a friend of mine yesterday. We both work within the telecom and datacom industries and remembered how we, ten years ago, dreamed about how Wireless LAN would be rolled out and be accessible to everybody everywhere, with maybe ten or twenty Megabit connections available to all! We can try to imagine what the ruling paradigm will be in ten years, but it’s almost impossible to do so today. We just have to wait and see or try to take part in changing the future.

What I suppose I’m trying to say is this. If you try to predict the future, try to step outside of your current paradigm.

Don’t expect the future to resemble the present in any way.

June 24th, 2009

The Fight for (Non-)Human Rights!

The entirety of human history is filled with the struggle for the rights of various groups in the societies in which they live. The fact that the slaves of America were treated unfairly in comparison to the population around them eventually led to the the Emancipation Proclamation (1862) and the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution (1865), which ended slavery in the United States. The Suffragettes managed to change the status of the woman from being little more than an appendage of men into having the right to vote. New Zealand was the first country in the world to allow all women over the age of 21 to vote (1893). The African-American Civil Rights Movement (1955-1968), beginning with the peaceful demonstration of Rosa Parks in 1955 saw to it that everybody became aware of racial segregation and the rights of the African-American population. We’ve now covered more or less every human right there through one interest group or another. Gay rights, the right to abortion, the rights of former convicts, the right to integrity and personal freedom, the right to chose when you want to die, the freedom of speech, the right to chose your religion or to abstain from religion, and many many more. Others take up the cause of those who cannot fight for themselves; championing the rights of animals, trees or other natural phenomena.

We are rapidly moving into a society entirely unlike anything we have ever seen. New paradigms will become commonplace within the near future and I believe we must begin to talk about the rights of various groups of individuals we will meet in the future.

The human mind is like a computer in many ways. We can think of our memories and knowledge taking up ‘storage space’ and our ability to comprehend the environment we live in to be done in MIPS (Million Instructions Per Second). According to many estimates; computers with both more storage space and more MIPS will be available at reasonable prices within the next ten to fifteen years. It has been assumed that when machines even slightly surpass human intellect, they could improve their own designs in ways that were unforeseen or unintended by their designers. This would allow them to recursively augment themselves or each other into having even greater intelligence or ability. The first such improvements would be small, but as the machines become more intelligent they would become better at becoming more intelligent, which could lead to an exponential and quite sudden growth in intelligence.

I’m not leading up to a Terminator-scenario where robots kill all humans here, but I am suggesting that we need to prepare ourselves for the idea of intelligent and sentient machines. What rights would they have in our society? Would we force them to have a nationality? Would they be subject to the same laws as humans or animals? Would forcibly terminating one be considered murder or will it be seen in the same way as shutting off a light switch? Does it have a gender? How about machine/human marriage? Can a machine be gay? Can it belong to a religion?

Within a few short years, robotic implants and cyborgism will be not only feasible but commonplace. Malfunctioning knees will be replaced by a flexible metal alloy that works better than the real thing. Nanobots swimming in the bloodstream, feeding on the sugars you eat, will repair tissue damage and thus slow down aging better than any vitamin or antioxidant treatment you can think of today. External processing units will be connected in series to your own brain for those times where you need some extra processing power to think of a solution to a particularly tricky problem. When do we stop talking about people? Is it when we’ve replaced more than 50% of our mass with robotic components? What if I replace one organ at a time until only my (human) brain remains? I would have uninterrupted consciousness of being ‘me’ all along, but I would be 99% robot. What rights apply to me?

Furthermore, when computers have better processing speeds and storage than the human brain, why not ‘upload’ the human mind to a computer? Assume I (and here I mean “my human body” when I say “I”) was very old and dying. Imagine further that I had the ability to have a computer scan every single neuron in my brain and create a computer software version of it. I would still be the same ‘person’ with the same memories and the same skills, but I wouldn’t have a biological representation to call myself. What rights would I have? Would I keep my gender? Would I keep ownership rights to things that I owned while still in my human body? Would I continue receiving my pension payments? Would I have legal rights to myself so that nobody can ‘copy’ parts of my memory or personality?

What if I, the human mind in the non-human body, later have the opportunity to move this computer software version of myself into a new human body? Assume my real-life granddaughter decided she wanted to give me a body again and had the express permission of her husband to do so? Imagine if my memories and knowledge could be copied into the fetus before birth, allowing me to be born into a young body already with a full life of memories? How old would I be? What would my legal birthdate be? What if the new body was a different gender than my original gender? Would I still be able to draw my pension? Could I vote?

Instead of transferring my mind from the computer to the human body, imagine instead that my loving wife can’t bear to be apart from me so she decides to leave her physical body and join me inside the computer mind. Instead of existing as two separate computer software versions of ourselves we decide to merge our programs into one. What would our name be? Our gender? Would we be considered a third, new, individual rather than a union of two? Would this new joint mind own the properties of both previous individuals? What if this joint software mind decided to assume a human body later on?

Even though this may read like science fiction to many of you, these are problems that we will face sooner or later. Shunning these questions and thinking that they are a problem for future generations may very well be a mistake. They’re happening now.